Comments for shit that does stuff... http://www.shitthatdoesstuff.com a site for shit that does stuff Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:26:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Comment on Quato better than Eizo? by admin http://www.shitthatdoesstuff.com/2011/01/09/quato-better-than-eizo/comment-page-1/#comment-135 admin Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:26:02 +0000 http://www.shitthatdoesstuff.com/?p=244#comment-135 Absolutely. Problem is that everyone is chasing the holy grail of wanting to see the whole of Adobe RGB. A flawed mission in my opinion... Absolutely. Problem is that everyone is chasing the holy grail of wanting to see the whole of Adobe RGB. A flawed mission in my opinion…

]]> Comment on Quato better than Eizo? by alxknt http://www.shitthatdoesstuff.com/2011/01/09/quato-better-than-eizo/comment-page-1/#comment-4 alxknt Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:56:37 +0000 http://www.shitthatdoesstuff.com/?p=244#comment-4 doesn't the quato profile plot just reflect that it's a 'wide-gamut' display (and comes close to 100% AdobeRGB), whereas the old CG211 is not and thus is closer to sRGB in available gamut ? alex. doesn’t the quato profile plot just reflect that it’s a ‘wide-gamut’ display (and comes close to 100% AdobeRGB), whereas the old CG211 is not and thus is closer to sRGB in available gamut ?

alex.

]]>